![]() |
eWork and Regional Development: Evidence |
![]() |
|||
The EMERGENCE approachThe EMERGENCE project defines eWork as information-based work carried out remotely, ie away from the employers premises and delivered over a telecommunications link regardless of whether this is carried out on office-type premises or elsewhere, or whether it is carried out by employees of the organisation or outsourced. In all, nine different categories of eWork are identified (Huws, ORegan, 2001).
The definition of remoteness used in EMERGENCE varies according to the type of eWork. Where individual forms of eWork (telehomeworking and multilocational working) are involved, remote means any location away from the employers premises. Where eWorking is undertaken by groups in office-based forms (such as a remote back office or an outsourced supplier), then remote is defined as being outside the NUTS 1 region where the establishment is located. The latter includes relocation across national borders. Although the evidence from EMERGENCE clearly shows that most eWork relocation is relatively short distance (certainly within NUTS 1 regions), the project used this definition of remoteness for its research on office-based eWork in order to minimise the effects of geographic proximity between source and destination locations by focusing firmly on telemediated work in which a clear role of ICT can be shown. The EMERGENCE research covered seven main generic business functions which lend themselves to eWork because they are information-intensive and involve content which may be digitised and communicated from a remote site by a telecommunications link.
| |||||
|
the Project © 2002, Institute for Employment Studies |
|||||